17 unanswered points, same unanswered questions: Colorado falls short against Utah

30

For the first half Saturday night, Colorado football looked like a team that had spent its bye week fixing very little.

The Buffaloes entered halftime against No. 11 Utah with 70 yards of total offense, eight penalties for 82 yards and no points. Their defense had forced an interception and repeatedly kept the game within reach, but Colorado’s offense had done almost nothing with those opportunities.

Then, for much of the second half, the Buffaloes looked like a completely different team.

Colorado (2-4, 0-3 Big 12) scored 17 unanswered points in the third quarter, briefly took the lead and nearly completed the upset before falling 27-24 to undefeated Utah (6-0, 3-0 Big 12) at Folsom Field on Saturday, Oct. 17.

The Buffaloes finished with 394 total yards, including 324 after halftime, while Utah escaped Boulder with its 12th consecutive victory dating back to last season.

But Colorado did not need another game to prove it could compete with a nationally ranked opponent. It has already demonstrated flashes of that ability throughout the season.

What it has not demonstrated is the discipline or consistency required to turn that potential into victories.

Saturday was Colorado’s fourth consecutive loss. And while the players and coaches remained optimistic about their progress afterward, there is a reasonable question about how much longer simply being able to compete with the top teams in the conference, rather than actually finishing games and beating them, should be celebrated.

First-half mistakes leave Colorado’s defense carrying the load

Utah entered Saturday averaging 42.8 points and 502 total yards per game, and its opening possession quickly demonstrated why.

Quarterback Devon Dampier led the Utes on a 12-play, 75-yard drive ending with an 8-yard touchdown pass to tight end Hunter Andrews. Dampier’s mobility presented an immediate problem for Colorado, forcing defenders to account for both his arm and his legs while Utah repeatedly found space across the middle of the field.

The Buffaloes struggled to contain Utah’s rushing attack, particularly when defenders failed to finish tackles in the backfield.

Still, Colorado’s defense gradually adjusted.

The defensive front began collapsing Dampier’s pocket, forcing hurried throws and limiting his opportunities to escape pressure. Linebackers Liona Lefau and Gideon Lampron were active throughout the game, while safety Randon Fontenette continued establishing himself as one of Colorado’s most dependable defenders.

Utah managed another field goal in the second quarter, but Colorado’s defense continued finding ways to keep the game within reach.

Defensive lineman Dylan Manuel intercepted Dampier near Colorado’s goal line, giving the Buffaloes an opportunity to finally build some offensive momentum. Instead, the ensuing possession ended with an interception of its own. Utah capitalized with another field goal, extending its lead to 13-0 before halftime.

It was a familiar sequence: the defense creates an opportunity, and the offense promptly gives it back.

Offensive coordinator Brennan Marion remained committed to establishing the run despite Utah’s defensive front making conventional rushing attempts difficult. Quarterback Isaac Wilson was largely limited to conservative passing opportunities, leaving Colorado with few ways to generate explosive plays.

That approach was especially concerning against a Utah defense that entered the game allowing just 78.8 rushing yards per contest.

And when the Buffaloes did have opportunities to move the football, penalties only made matters worse.

“We got to stop the mindless penalties,” Sanders said during his Oct. 13 press conference.

Four days later, Colorado entered halftime with more penalty yards than total offensive yards.

Boo Carter’s personal foul following a Utah reception in the second quarter was particularly frustrating. The play had already resulted in a first down, yet Colorado surrendered another 13 yards because of an unnecessary infraction.

There is a difference between penalties committed while attempting to make a football play and those serving no meaningful purpose. Colorado continues struggling with both, despite Sanders repeatedly identifying discipline as an area needing improvement.

The Buffaloes were already facing one of the strongest teams in the Big 12. They did not need to make Utah’s job any easier.

By halftime, the defense had done enough to keep Colorado competitive.

The offense had given it almost nothing in return.

Wilson leads a second-half resurgence against his former team

Whatever changed in Colorado’s locker room at halftime produced an almost immediate response.

On the Buffaloes’ opening possession of the third quarter, Wilson connected with running back JaQuail Smith on a short pass that turned into a 68-yard touchdown on third-and-three.

The three-play, 75-yard drive took just 1:40 off the clock, cutting Utah’s lead to 13-7.

For the first time all night, Colorado’s offense looked capable of creating something beyond a short rushing gain or a conservative pass toward the sideline. And the difference was not simply that Colorado had begun throwing the football more effectively. Wilson looked like an entirely different quarterback.

After spending much of the first half operating within a predictable offense, the third-year quarterback began extending plays, challenging defenders with his legs and creating opportunities when plays broke down.

Against his former teammates, Wilson appeared particularly willing to initiate contact rather than avoid it, running directly into defenders instead of always protecting himself with a slide or settling for the sideline. It was almost comical watching a quarterback who had spent the first half operating so conservatively suddenly look determined to run through Utah’s defense himself.

Wilson’s physicality brought another dimension to an offense that had looked remarkably limited before halftime. Rather than relying exclusively on designed runs or quick throws, he was increasingly willing to improvise and make something happen.

That confidence was encouraging, especially considering his three-interception performance against Texas Tech two weeks earlier. But it also raised questions about why Colorado needed an entire half to begin playing with that level of freedom.

The defense forced a punt on Utah’s following possession, giving Wilson another opportunity.

This time, Colorado put together a five-play, 76-yard scoring drive. Wilson found Quanell Farrakhan Jr. and Joseph Williams for gains of 15 yards apiece, while Smith contributed two productive runs before DeKalon Taylor broke through for an 18-yard touchdown.

In less than six minutes, the Buffaloes had erased their entire first-half deficit and taken a 14-13 lead.

The improvement was particularly significant considering how little Colorado had accomplished offensively before halftime. The rushing attack was finally producing meaningful yardage, while Wilson’s willingness to distribute the ball made the offense considerably harder to defend.

And for once, Colorado was giving its defense something to build on.

With Utah facing third-and-three, safety Naeten Mitchell jumped Dampier’s pass for an interception, returning it 20 yards to the Utah 35-yard line. The play was aided by pressure from Santana Hopper, another example of Colorado’s pass rush creating opportunities for the secondary.

The Buffaloes could not reach the end zone, but Elliott Arnold converted a 32-yard field goal to extend Colorado’s lead to 17-13.

After entering halftime without a point, Colorado had scored on three consecutive possessions. For the first time all night, the offense was capitalizing on the opportunities its defense created.

But the advantage did not last.

Utah responded with an eight-play, 75-yard drive, including a 43-yard completion to Creed Whittemore on third-and-10 that exposed another lapse in Colorado’s secondary. Dampier eventually found Braden Pegan for a 16-yard touchdown, restoring Utah’s lead at 20-17 with just over a minute remaining in the third quarter.

Colorado had outscored Utah 17-7 in the period and completely changed the direction of the game.

It still entered the fourth quarter trailing.

And despite everything the Buffaloes had done to put themselves back in contention, they still needed to finish.

Colorado’s defense creates opportunities, but the offense does not sustain them

Colorado’s defensive performance deserves considerable recognition, particularly given how frequently the unit has been forced to compensate for offensive mistakes.

The Buffaloes finished with three sacks and two interceptions, repeatedly disrupting Dampier’s timing and forcing him to make decisions under pressure.

Fontenette was especially productive, forcing a fumble and making important plays in coverage. Mitchell contributed his interception, while RJ Johnson helped the secondary settle in after a difficult opening stretch.

Lampron, who finished with 11 tackles, was equally encouraged by the unit’s performance.

“We just put together a full game as a defense,” Lampron said afterward.

Colorado’s pass rush has become one of the few consistently dependable strengths on the roster.

While the secondary has struggled with tackling and coverage, particularly across the middle of the field, it has individual playmakers capable of changing games. When both units operate together, opponents have considerably fewer opportunities to launch effective offensive attacks.

The difference was visible against Utah. As the defensive front increasingly disrupted Dampier’s pocket, the secondary became more effective at contesting throws and limiting his options.

But Utah still controlled possession for 37 minutes compared to Colorado’s 23, forcing the Buffaloes’ defense to spend significantly more time on the field.

That imbalance made the offense’s inability to sustain its second-half momentum even more consequential.

Early in the fourth quarter, Wilson began using his legs more frequently, picking up short gains as the Buffaloes tried to establish another scoring drive. But Colorado’s possession stalled, and the offense was forced to punt.

With just over five minutes remaining and the Buffaloes trailing 20-17, Wilson threw his second interception of the night.

Utah cornerback James Chenault Jr. returned it 30 yards to the Colorado 22-yard line, putting the Utes in immediate scoring position.

Three plays later, Dampier found Pegan for a 6-yard touchdown, extending Utah’s advantage to 27-17 with 3:43 remaining.

It was another familiar sequence: a costly offensive turnover followed by an opponent’s scoring opportunity.

Colorado’s defense had helped create the comeback, but it could not continually compensate for the offense’s mistakes.

Yet Wilson was not finished.

With Colorado facing a 10-point deficit, he began another aggressive drive. On second-and-10, Wilson took off for a 17-yard gain, using his legs to move the Buffaloes toward midfield.

On the next play, he connected with DeAndre Moore Jr. for a 48-yard completion that moved Colorado inside Utah’s 5-yard line.

Wilson eventually found Moore again for a 2-yard touchdown, cutting the deficit to 27-24 with 1:21 remaining.

Utah recovered the ensuing onside kick, but Colorado’s defense forced another punt, giving Wilson one final opportunity with 56 seconds remaining.

The ensuing drive nearly produced one of the game’s most remarkable moments.

After moving Colorado away from its own goal line, Wilson scrambled up the middle and attempted to pitch the ball to a teammate, who continued downfield into potential field-goal range. But officials reviewed the play and ruled the pitch an illegal forward pass, negating the additional yardage. Colorado was pushed back, and the game’s final Hail Mary attempt fell incomplete.

Wilson finished with 256 passing yards, two touchdowns, two interceptions and 41 rushing yards.

His determination, especially his willingness to extend plays and embrace contact against his former team, was one of Colorado’s most encouraging developments.

The loss was clearly personal for Wilson, who told reporters afterward, “I’m so mad and sad about that game.”

“Isaac is that guy,” Sanders said afterward, reiterating his confidence in the junior.

But the coach also acknowledged that the result was a collective failure, saying it was not a one-man effort.

And that distinction matters.

Wilson’s second-half performance demonstrated why Sanders has continued giving him opportunities under center. But it also reinforced how little room Colorado has for mistakes when its offense spends entire halves struggling to establish itself.

The Buffaloes had finally shown what their offense was capable of producing. Unfortunately, they had also spent the game demonstrating exactly why those moments have not translated into victories.

At what point does almost winning stop being enough?

“I did something I never do after a loss,” Sanders said.

After the game, Sanders emphasized Colorado’s resilience, revealing that he had taken an unusual approach when addressing the team in the locker room; he said he told his players how proud he was of their performance.

Sanders praised Colorado’s willingness to continue competing despite the halftime deficit and expressed confidence in the team’s ability to win. That assessment is understandable. Colorado could have accepted a 13-point halftime deficit against an undefeated opponent and allowed the game to become considerably less competitive. Instead, the Buffaloes fought back, took the lead and nearly completed the upset.

But Sanders’ continued optimism also raises questions, particularly when those same encouraging performances continue producing the same disappointing results.

During the postgame press conference, he suggested Colorado had been capable of winning nearly every game it had lost this season, acknowledging Northwestern as an exception. Discussing the other losses, Sanders said he felt Colorado “had a better team,” but it “didn’t execute.”

There is something concerning about that assessment.

It is one thing to lose because an opponent is simply better. It is another to repeatedly believe your team has the ability to win, only to watch penalties, turnovers and inconsistent execution determine the outcome.

If Colorado genuinely believes it has been the better team in several of its losses, then the continued failure to turn that talent into results becomes even more difficult to explain.

And Saturday provided another example.

The Buffaloes finished with 10 penalties for 93 yards, compared to Utah’s seven for 61. They threw two interceptions, failed to sustain offensive momentum for an entire half and needed a dramatic fourth-quarter drive just to bring the game within three points.

These are not isolated mistakes anymore.

They are recurring problems that might be becoming part of Colorado’s identity.

Perhaps more concerning is how familiar the conversation surrounding those mistakes has become.

After the Texas Tech loss two weeks earlier, Sanders similarly defended his players’ effort and insisted they were not quitting, though his assessment of their overall performance was considerably more critical. Colorado held a halftime lead before surrendering 26 unanswered points.

Against Utah, the sequence was reversed, with the Buffaloes overcoming a halftime deficit before eventually falling short. The circumstances were different, but the outcome was the same. And so was much of the postgame messaging.

There is absolutely value in building confidence during a losing streak. Sanders should recognize his players’ effort, especially when they demonstrate the resilience Colorado showed Saturday. He even acknowledged afterward that “the record tells a different story” than the players’ performances might suggest. But accountability has to exist alongside that encouragement. Refusing to quit should be a baseline expectation, not an accomplishment that overshadows the inability to execute.

That distinction matters, especially for a program in its fourth season under Sanders. Colorado is no longer in the early stages of a coaching transition. The program has had multiple recruiting cycles and extensive transfer-portal opportunities to build a roster capable of competing in the Big 12. The expectations should be higher than simply proving Colorado can compete with good teams.

A three-point loss to an undefeated, nationally ranked opponent is certainly more encouraging than the Buffaloes’ previous performances.

But it is still a loss.

And perhaps the most frustrating part of Saturday was that Colorado did not need to discover an entirely new offense or suddenly become a different defensive team.

The second half demonstrated what the Buffaloes were already capable of accomplishing.

They simply needed to execute that football for four quarters instead of two.

Colorado travels to No. 18 Oklahoma State on Saturday, Oct. 24, looking to end its four-game losing streak and earn its first Big 12 victory of the season.

The defense continues creating opportunities. Wilson has shown he can lead productive drives. Colorado has the individual talent necessary to compete.

None of those things are new revelations.

Colorado does not need another game to prove it has the talent to compete.

It needs a game that proves that talent can actually produce a win.